Apr 16, 2023·edited Apr 16, 2023Liked by Jim Reagen
I've arrived to the conclusion that I cannot -and will not- trust democrats. At the twilight of my life, the events carried by democrat, overwhelmingly, have been detrimental to our Republic and the its citizens. Now, the entire globe is suffering. RFK is deep into that doctrine (how can he not be) and as you pointed out the next 'weapon' in their lugubrious arsenal will be devastating. He wrote about it in his latest book; perhaps hoping that we'd think that 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend'. So many have been siding with him.
Climate has been one of their perpetual' repeatedly failed, prophesies. The ultimate weapon for their ambitious domain on humanity.
RFK is getting a pass on much, and lots of support, because of his vax stance which certainly resonates with many. But he has always been as crazy about climate as Birx was about covid -- and the ends will be worse. So agree...not having it.
Thanks for posting this, Jim. I admit that my thoughts on climate change were different in 2020 than they are now. But I still see regenerative agriculture, giving local control over food production and animal husbandry, as the solution. I'm skeptical of RFK myself, much as I LOVED his RAF book. But I see him surrounding himself with people I think are fakes, and not calling them on it. I'd be curious as to what his solutions were in the book (although not quite curious enough to buy or read it.)
“One day, democrats will restrict your freedoms, restrict your history, and restrict your safety. All in the name of professional victims that don’t understand the consequences of their ignorance. --Ronald Reagan, 1987.---
“This is the issue of this election: whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that the little intellectual elite in a far-distant capitol can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.” Reagan Speech, 1964
The climate "crisis" is one of many false conclusions that are reached through disregard for The Principles of Reasoning. While Aristotle left us the Principles of Reasoning for the deductive logic he did not leave us the Principles of Reasoning for the inductive logic. The inductive differs from the deductive logic in the respect that information about the outcomes of the events of the future for the physical system being modelled is missing. The late theoretical physicist Ronald Arlie Christensen left us the Principles of Reasoning for both the inducductive and the deductive logic. They are "entropy minimax." See Christensen's seven volume work entitled "The Entropy Minimax Sourcebook" for details. Entropy minimax solves the ancient, previously unsolved Problem of Induction. The problem is of how, in a logically permissible way, to select the set of inferences that will be made by a model of a physical system form a larger set of possibilities. Many of the catastrophes for mankind that are currently unfolding result from failure to implement Christensen's Principles of Reasoning. The resurgence of totalitarian rule over mankind is amongst these catastrophes.
I've arrived to the conclusion that I cannot -and will not- trust democrats. At the twilight of my life, the events carried by democrat, overwhelmingly, have been detrimental to our Republic and the its citizens. Now, the entire globe is suffering. RFK is deep into that doctrine (how can he not be) and as you pointed out the next 'weapon' in their lugubrious arsenal will be devastating. He wrote about it in his latest book; perhaps hoping that we'd think that 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend'. So many have been siding with him.
Climate has been one of their perpetual' repeatedly failed, prophesies. The ultimate weapon for their ambitious domain on humanity.
RFK is getting a pass on much, and lots of support, because of his vax stance which certainly resonates with many. But he has always been as crazy about climate as Birx was about covid -- and the ends will be worse. So agree...not having it.
Well, I can only hope you're wrong on that.
I've been following Tony Heller for years now.
I must say I was moved by RFK's speech: hard to believe he'd sell us out like that.
We so desperately need a good, intelligent leader.
Time will tell, I guess.
Thanks for posting this, Jim. I admit that my thoughts on climate change were different in 2020 than they are now. But I still see regenerative agriculture, giving local control over food production and animal husbandry, as the solution. I'm skeptical of RFK myself, much as I LOVED his RAF book. But I see him surrounding himself with people I think are fakes, and not calling them on it. I'd be curious as to what his solutions were in the book (although not quite curious enough to buy or read it.)
REMINDER:
“One day, democrats will restrict your freedoms, restrict your history, and restrict your safety. All in the name of professional victims that don’t understand the consequences of their ignorance. --Ronald Reagan, 1987.---
“This is the issue of this election: whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that the little intellectual elite in a far-distant capitol can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.” Reagan Speech, 1964
The climate "crisis" is one of many false conclusions that are reached through disregard for The Principles of Reasoning. While Aristotle left us the Principles of Reasoning for the deductive logic he did not leave us the Principles of Reasoning for the inductive logic. The inductive differs from the deductive logic in the respect that information about the outcomes of the events of the future for the physical system being modelled is missing. The late theoretical physicist Ronald Arlie Christensen left us the Principles of Reasoning for both the inducductive and the deductive logic. They are "entropy minimax." See Christensen's seven volume work entitled "The Entropy Minimax Sourcebook" for details. Entropy minimax solves the ancient, previously unsolved Problem of Induction. The problem is of how, in a logically permissible way, to select the set of inferences that will be made by a model of a physical system form a larger set of possibilities. Many of the catastrophes for mankind that are currently unfolding result from failure to implement Christensen's Principles of Reasoning. The resurgence of totalitarian rule over mankind is amongst these catastrophes.
Terry Oldberg
Engineer/Scientist/Public Policy Researcher
Los Altos Hills, California, USA
1-650-518-6636 (mobile)
terry_oldberg@yahoo.com