I'd add that I don't think we should be ruled by anyone. We can keep decisions local, a concept known as subsidiarity, wherein problems are handled at the most local authority. This runs completely counter to the ideas of the globalists who want their fingers in everyone's pie.
We never needed a global answer to Covid as it could've been handled perfectly well at the local level. We don't need a global answer to CO2 because CO2 catastrophe isn't real.
But what we do need, I think, is a re-vamped International Criminal Court and severe penalties for using technology to harm, hinder, control or surveil the population, regardless of whether this is done knowingly or not. Imagine the power of technology 50 years hence. We have to ensure this isn't used against the people, and stop the current abuses.
So, to circle back to other concerns, whether or not viruses exist pales in comparison to the problem of encroaching technological control. It's not even an issue, in my book, even if viruses don't exist.
That's what I was "saying"... you deserve a bigger audience! I shared your post in a note.
My own small stack has grown a lot (and I've not posted since November!) mainly because I engage a lot with other writers in their comments sections, even though that wasn't the reason for my doing so.
well... I'm here in the theater with Joannie H. clapping with equal vigor. I do declare that I've read it more than once (My mind takes those trips to 1984, etc. while my eyes are busy chewing line after line.) I enjoy your writing tremendously. THANK YOU.
I'd add that I don't think we should be ruled by anyone. We can keep decisions local, a concept known as subsidiarity, wherein problems are handled at the most local authority. This runs completely counter to the ideas of the globalists who want their fingers in everyone's pie.
We never needed a global answer to Covid as it could've been handled perfectly well at the local level. We don't need a global answer to CO2 because CO2 catastrophe isn't real.
But what we do need, I think, is a re-vamped International Criminal Court and severe penalties for using technology to harm, hinder, control or surveil the population, regardless of whether this is done knowingly or not. Imagine the power of technology 50 years hence. We have to ensure this isn't used against the people, and stop the current abuses.
So, to circle back to other concerns, whether or not viruses exist pales in comparison to the problem of encroaching technological control. It's not even an issue, in my book, even if viruses don't exist.
A hundred percent, yes!
I feel as if I'm clapping (vigorously) in an empty theatre! You have nailed the situation so well.
My readership isn't that high-- I don't post enough-- so maybe you are clapping in a nearly empty theater. But, thanks!
That's what I was "saying"... you deserve a bigger audience! I shared your post in a note.
My own small stack has grown a lot (and I've not posted since November!) mainly because I engage a lot with other writers in their comments sections, even though that wasn't the reason for my doing so.
well... I'm here in the theater with Joannie H. clapping with equal vigor. I do declare that I've read it more than once (My mind takes those trips to 1984, etc. while my eyes are busy chewing line after line.) I enjoy your writing tremendously. THANK YOU.
Excellent writing and synthesis, Jim. Maybe the most important article on the Covid Op!
Thank you!
Am going to share this with my representatives Tuesday in Albany ny, autism action and children’s health defense gathering. Well done!