Malone is suing Dr. Breggin for defamation to the tune of $25 million. This is a huge, controversial rift in the opposition against dismantling liberty, whose first major assault happened during Covid-19. Many believe Malone is correct and that Breggin has been harassing him; I believe that Breggin is absolutely correct and Malone is attacking him for that very reason.
One of Malone’s points of contention is that Breggin has been relentless in attacking Desmet, whom Malone has been relentless in promoting. Some say they’re both right (Malone and Breggin) but I think not: it’s very clear to me that Desmet is talking psychobabble when he talks of mass formation. Yes, such a thing did indeed happen, but it was directed and orchestrated during Covid-19 precisely to instill fear in the populace, likely to see how far they could manipulate us. Ideally they’d have been able to install a system of mandatory vaccine passports.
But to Desmet, nothing at all was orchestrated. I have his book, The Psychology of Totalitarianism. In it, by way of proof that there was no orchestration he introduces us to the Sierpinski triangle, reproduced below:
This triangle is constructed using a few simple rules and the end result is that it appears to be highly orchestrated, but is not. That, in Desmet’s view, is the sum of mass formation. There was no conspiracy.
Breggin’s take on Desmet can be found here.
I no longer trust Dr. Malone and have unsubscribed as a paid viewer of his substack— no doubt to his relief as I’ve not been silent about this. Malone is, at least, a vengeful man to be suing Breggin, but I suspect a lot more is going on. Desmet clearly has the wrong end of the stick, and that Malone refuses to acknowledge this raises a huge red flag for me.
Regarding Langan, why Malone bothered to promote him is also a red flag and I still haven’t figured out what’s going on there. But I can listen to the man for about two minutes and I get sick. He’s obviously a charlatan and egomaniac. His metaphysics sucks, and I know because I studied metaphysics in college. Real people don’t talk like that and I don’t accept the BS that he’s so smart that his language is beyond us; if he’s so smart then he’d know that his concepts need to be expressed clearly and distinctly, as our friend Descartes might say.
Desmet and Langan: confused babble, fairly easy to see through. Yet Malone says: “look here! Aren’t these folks brilliant?”
Something is very wrong.
Thank you very much for sharing your analysis on Malone. Dr Breggin has the expertise to identify the fallacy of Desmet’s fabrication.
Red Flag indeed!!